Sunday, June 21, 2015

JURASSIC WORLD/ INSIDE OUT

A Whole World, Inside Out
Big-Budget Dino Flick and Colorful But Honest Family Film Both Out to Grip Viewers

In 1993, Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park hit theaters and wowed audiences with its cutting-edge special effects that made it possible for the world to fathom dinosaur-versus-human action. In 1995, Toy Story became the first full-length, fully-computer-animated film to hit theaters, enchanting audiences and opening up a world of creative possibilities. Jurassic Park spawned two (now three) sequels and kept the bar high for filmmakers to bring audiences big, wowzer spectacles they would remember. Toy Story kicked off a string of computer-animated family films from Pixar that have proven to be some of the most wholesome, rewarding and successful films of the past two decades (never mind computer-animated flicks from other studios that were inspired by the same advances in technology). In the past week, I have seen a pair of high-profile releases that were, at least in part, inspired by those unforgettable films and most certainly contain strands of their DNA (Jurassic pun intended).

Steven Spielberg is only on board Jurassic World as a producer, but the first direct sequel to the 1993 dino hit contains more of the T-Rex roaring/velociraptor snarling/people running-and-screaming action we enjoyed, this happening in a glossy, fully functional dinosaur theme park of the type the original film’s rich entrepreneur John Hammond (the late Richard Attenborough) imagined. Inside Out is not a sequel to Toy Story (there have already been two of those, with a rumored third on the way), but it continues in very much the same vein—fully-computer animated, bursting with brightg colors and bright ideas, meant to move adults while entertaining kids.

Kids. I think that’s the key word. I was merely a five-year-old tyke when I saw the first Jurassic Park, and my dad had to take me home halfway through the movie when I couldn’t handle the T-Rex’s thundering roars. And here comes the new film, which is definitely trying to conjure nostalgia from those who remember the first movie while also wrangling a whole new generation. And, per usual, the geniuses at Pixar have made a movie that should keep the kids’ attention with its color and action and music, but will have most older viewers rapt and misty-eyed, probably even more invested then their kids. Ultimately, I feel safe in saying Jurassic World is aiming for the kid in many of us, while Inside Out is out to touch (and move) the adults those Park-going kids grew into.

JURASSIC WORLD                                   Grade: B
Directed by Colin Trevorrow

Now a fully functioning dinosaur theme park straight out of the vision of the late John Hammond (Attenborough), Jurassic World is a thriving, billion-dollar establishment on Isla Nublar, a neighboring island to Costa Rica, which, in the words of current park-runner Claire (Bryce Dallas Howard, typically game), has captured “the eyes of the world”. Indeed, in one day, Claire has to deal with a visit from her estranged nephews (Ty Simpkins and Nick Robinson), a lurking military contractor (Vincent D’Onofrio) with a crude vision for how to use possibly-trainable velociraptors, a snarky dino trainer (Chris Pratt) who doesn’t think the park’s nearly as great as everyone else thinks it is, and her boss, super-rich Simon Masrani (Irrfan Khan), who wants to make sure everything is running smoothly and everyone is happy. Everything is running smoothly and everyone is happy—they spared no expense, after all—until the park’s new up-and-coming attraction, a genetically-modified predator called Indominus Rex, breaks out of its cage and begins killing people and dinos alike. Its rampage wrecks the exhibits of several other prize creatures, leaving Jurassic World awash with swarms of terrifying, carnivorous creatures that aren’t exactly meant to co-exist with people. With her nephews lost on the grounds—among other disasters—Claire must turn to Owen (Pratt), the dino expert, to find her nephews and maybe figure out a solution to the ultimate survival and PR nightmare.

World is intended as a first sequel to Jurassic Park, even though it chronologically takes place 22 years after the 1993 film. It’s thrilling to see a fully-functioning park (complete with water exhibit and dino petting zoo) like the one Hammond envisioned, and computer graphics have, of course, made leaps and bounds in terms of being able to create glossy, lively-looking creatures. And, of course, once something bad happens, the bad things keep snowballing, and disaster and chases ensue. World is packing one heck of a popcorn factor, and its record-breaking grosses have already proven it’s imminently-watchable. There are a few genuine scares, some thrilling chases, a Hitchockian scene of winged terrors wreaking havoc on swarms of screaming people, and those spine-chilling, high-pitched T-Rex roars that marked your and my childhood. Speaking of your and my childhood, World comes complete with plenty of strains from John Williams’ now-classic score, an appearance from the same smarmy scientist (B.D. Wong) who was into creating genetically-enhanced dinosaurs the first time around, and use of some of the vehicles and equipment from the old park, which has fallen into disrepair. World is perhaps never better than when paying homage to the classic blockbuster that inspired it.

The problem with World, more often than not, is that it focuses too often on too many different groups of people, when, in most moveigoers’ minds, the people are a distant second to dinosaurs in terms of the movie’s main attraction. I mean, it’s nice that the movie tries to make sure its human characters are more than just dino-bait, but do we really care about the kids’ parents’ divorce when they’re going to be running for their lives in five minutes? The kids, at least, have some sense of arc to their story—and there are a couple amusing moments with a pair of nerdy techies who help run the park (Jake Johnson and Lauren Lapkus)—but Vincent D’Onofrio is saddled with a clichéd, over-the-top villain who has no real purpose except to generate some audience ire and to get eaten by a dino in a Villain Death Scene that is almost embarrassingly written. The likeable Chris Pratt holds serve, getting to do hero things and toss out a few one-liners here and there, but the most effective and developed performance in the film is given by Bryce Dallas Howard. Sure, her character may be a series of sexist tropes (she goes into the jungle in heels, her outfit, like her personally, is super buttoned-up, etc…), but Howard, per usual, gives it her all, and manages to make a line like “your parents will never let me see you again” effectively funny and sad at the same time.

It’s all a build-up to a wild, CGI-splashed climax that, in my book, is surely over-the-top, but it does feature a pivotal appearance by a lead character from the earlier films who is only too welcome. Plus,the movie gives a direct and obvious lifeline to a likely sequel, which is at least more legitimate than something like Transformers, in which the world is saved, everyone is safe…until they’re not, randomly, in the next movie, because dollars. World has already devoured the box office and certainly delivers some epic spectacle, but, for me, is a little over-plotted and a little too crazy at the end. Cut some unnecessary characters and tamp it down a bit. Still, this is the kind of movie you should see on the big screen. Now excuse me while I go hum the John Williams theme for the rest of my life.

**JURASSIC WORLD is rated PG-13 for constant intense action and scenes of peril, some blood, scary moments, and some language


INSIDE OUT                                                Grade: A
Directed by Pete Docter and Ronaldo Del Carmen

In the beginning, a baby named Riley was born. Shortly thereafter, her first emotion came into existence. Joy (voiced by a perfectly-cast Amy Poehler) is perky and happy and wants Riley to just enjoy the heck out of herself. Unfortunately, she’s almost immediately counter-balanced by the appearance of Sadness (voiced by Phyllis Smith, of The Office fame), a more morose individual who tends to bring the mood down. In short order, it’s not just Joy and Sadness, but also Fear (Bill Hader), Anger (Lewis Black) and Disgust (Mindy Kaling) all vying for control of little Riley (voiced as a preteen by Kaitlyn Dias), and guiding her through the process of life. Early on, all is well, as Riley is loved by her parents (voiced by Diane Lane and Kyle MacLachlan), has a few great friends, is a stellar young hockey player, and has a chipper growing-up in rural Minnesota. Joy—running the show—has a relatively easy go of it. But then, the little family unexpectedly moves, and things get harder than Joy ever thought they could. Soon Riley’s way more accustomed to fear and sadness and uncertainty, even anger, and the hope she drew from her core memories of love and happiness seems to be dimming. When all the new anxiety of moving hits home, little Riley’s emotional state is thrown completely out of whack, sending Joy tumbling back into the recesses of the little girl’s brain, threatening to send her into a truly damaging downward spiral. Joy struggles to get back to save Riley from endless fear and sadness, but Joy has to be brave, she has to be strong, and she has to be willing to cede some control in order to leave Riley a healthy, realistically-happy girl.

I suppose you could have gleaned that much from the trailers or other online material—that’s fine, I don’t want to give away more, because Inside Out is a Treat. We all know Pixar is a home-run hitting machine that has given us one brilliant, unique, instant-classic for-all-ages entertainment after another (Toy Story, Monsters, Inc., Cars, Finding Nemo, The Incredibles, Wall-E, Up, Ratatouille, etc…), but Inside Out is—pardon the pun—a true joy, a delightful, imaginative film that isn’t above asking some hard questions and bringing viewers deep into their own nostalgic consciousness. This one of those movies in which you will literally laugh and cry. This is probably the ultimate and most appropriate movie to use the description “hit you in the feels”. The movie’s got a Grade-A imaginative streak even by Pixar standards, with brilliant, clever depictions of fantasies, trains of thought, imaginary friends, the make-up of dreams and nightmares, and increasing maturity. Most touchingly, it shows the importance of sadness (a more apt word might be sentimentality) in keeping people grounded and honest and relatable to others, in addition to mere happiness. I wouldn’t say there’s anything here that has quite the searing emotional pop of the most dramatic moments of Up, but it’s kind of like the emotional climax of Toy Story 3 for 90 minutes. Like I said, I laughed, I was delighted, and I eagerly looked forward to the next ingenious creation, but, watching it, I felt a little like I did while I watched the TV drama Breaking Bad—I had to see how it turned out because I was invested, but I was super stressed as well, because I knew there would be dramatic obstacles to tangle things up even further, to keep our happy ending even further away (this is also true of the cute short film Lava, which plays before the beginning of Inside Out).

I suppose the writers (Meg LeFauve, Josh Cooley and director Pete Docter) deserve a lion’s share of the credit for this cleverness, along with the peerless animators and art directors, but, as stated, this movie arguably the perfect vehicle for Amy Poehler. Her relentless personality is needed here, effectively displaying Joy’s tenacity and zeal in her quest to make Riley a happy and well-rounded person. The energetic comedienne can be a lot to take in her live-action roles (such as in her recently-completed TV comedy Parks & Recreation), but her vivid personality is well-suited to the likes of this material. Her chief supporter, Phyllis Smith as Sadness, is nearly as effective, though admittedly with much different material, and, as a sidekick named Bing Bong (a figment of Riley’s colorful imagination), Richard Kind immediately lands on the top-shelf of Pixar’s best sidekicks/supporting characters in a nostalgic turn that relentlessly tugs the heartstrings.

Is Inside Out Pixar’s best? I suppose at this point that’s a bit like asking which of Shakespeare’s plays is the best, or which of Dr. Seuss’s kids’ books is the best. But I will say Inside Out, though delightfully creative in its visual images at times, strikes me as the most obviously for-older-viewers of Pixar’s films. Oh, kids will probably get a kick out of it, because it’s a splash of bright colors and excitement, but older viewers (if my friends and I are any indication) will be on the edges of their seats, and may have to fight back, or succumb to, the tears this movie can bring. Like most of Pixar’s output, Inside Out is a treasure.

**INSIDE OUT is rated PG. It contains some intense moments, a few scary images, and some intense emotional content.


Jurassic World (2015)
Directed by Colin Trevorrow
Screenplay by Rick Jaffa, Amanda Silver, Colin Trevorrow, and Derek Connolly
Based on an idea by Michael Crichton (author of the novel ‘Jurassic Park’)
Starring: Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Ty Simpkins, Nick Robinson, Vincent D’Onofrio, B.D. Wong, Irrfan Khan, Jake Johnson, Judy Greer and Katie McGrath
Rated: PG-13
Length: 124 minutes

Inside Out (2015)
Directed by Pete Docter and Ronaldo Del Carmen
Screenplay by Meg LeFauve, Josh Cooley and Pete Docter
Featuring the Voices Of: Amy Poehler, Phyllis Smith, Richard Kind, Bill Hader, Mindy Kaling, Lewis Black, Kaitlyn Dias, Diane Lane and Kyle MacLachlan
Rated PG
Length: 94 minutes