Wonder Woman (2017)
Rating: 8/10
STARRING: Gal Gadot, Chris Pine, Danny Huston, Connie Nielsen, David Thewlis, Elena Anaya, Robin Wright, Said Taghmaoui, Ewen Bremner and Eugene Brave Rock, with Lucy Davis as Etta and Lilly Aspell as Young Diana
RATED PG-13 for intense action, some emotional content, and some language
After
2016, the DC Universe was reeling.
First, their long-awaited Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice came
out in March and, despite scoring impressive box-office returns, landed
with a thud. The film had its defenders, but most said it was too long, too
slow, too busy setting up future movies and, oh yeah, had too little actual Batman
vs. Superman in it. August’s Suicide
Squad fared even worse. The movie flopped hard with iffy effects, too many
characters, and a couple of pathetic, cringe-inducing villains. At that point,
it was clear DC was lagging way behind Marvel in terms of big-screen quality and
fanfare, a problem considering they had two flagship films planned for 2017: Wonder Woman and Justice League. Justice
League has yet to be seen, but the June release Wonder Woman proved a huge shot in the arm to DC financially and publicly. Not that people didn’t expect it to be successful; the first
female-superhero fronted film, riding the momentum of Israeli actress Gal Gadot’s
winning cameo in Batman v Superman,
had many people curious. But after the high-profile disappointments of 2016,
and with DC’s great hope ensemble piece on the horizon, there was legitimate
worry that Wonder Woman would take
even more air out of the balloon.
Well, we all know how that turned
out.
After a brief present-day prologue
(complete with Wayne Enterprises plug), Wonder Woman shows us young Diana (Lilly Aspell), Princess of
Themyscira, a shining city in the mythical Paradise Islands populated entirely
by the tough female Amazons. Daughter of Queen Hippolyta (Connie Nielsen),
Diana grows up yearning for adventure and longing to fight like her tough aunt
Antiope (Robin Wright). When actually given the opportunity, Diana (played as
an adult by Gadot) proves a deft hand, showing powers none of her fellow
Amazons can match. But, with great power comes…well, you know. After a training
incident in which she nearly kills Antiope, Diana hides in shame on a secluded
corner of the island, only to get a front-row seat when a damaged airplane
crashes in the ocean in front of Themyscira, with a lone male pilot (Chris
Pine) struggling to escape. Diana saves him, and marvels. He’s a man! Spoiler: she’s never seen a man (all-female Amazons,
remember?). The man, Steve Trevor, marvels himself when he awakes and learns of
Diana, the Amazons, their hidden island, and their lack of knowledge about The
Great War, in which he has been fighting as a spy against the Germans. Diana is
convicted at the idea of this great, costly war, and urges Hippolyta to send
her and other Amazons out to stop Ares (the Greek God of War, whom Diana has
been told corrupted the hearts of men and is responsible for their fighting). Hippolyta
rebuffs the idea of sending Amazons out into the world, but idealistic Diana
isn’t about to sit by after hearing Steve’s stories of the horrors of war.
Soon, Diana has left Themyscira with Steve, and is learning more about the
world, people, and war than she could have imagined. She and Steve are soon on
the trail of sadistic German General Ludendorf (Danny Huston), who sneers at
the talks of “armistice” while his top scientist (Elena Anaya) creates a gas
that kills everything it touches. Seeing casualties and fighting up close makes
Diana even more determined to stop Ludendorf, whose cold sadism can only mean
one thing: he’s Ares, her people’s sworn enemy.
I get that the movie came out five
months ago, so chances are you’ve seen it, so my spoiler-averse plot summary probably
doesn’t make much sense. Hey, a guy’s gotta practice, right? True, after
re-watching it last night, I feel like I barely touched
on half the movie’s plot, not to mention about half its main cast. I didn’t
even get to mention Diana and Steve’s growing chemistry, Diana’s amusing
fish-out-of-water routine in London, Steve’s delightfully chirpy secretary
(Lucy Davis) or his ragtag band of fellow undercover operators (Said Taghmaoui,
Ewen Bremner, and Eugene Brave Rock). Nor did I get to mention the movie’s
instant-classic No Man’s Land scene, in which Diana rises from a Western Front
trench in full WW gear and walks straight into the teeth of German
fire with her shield high and her head higher…
The thing is, while DC’s high point
was obviously the Dark Knight Trilogy, Marvel’s rival
studio has proven they can do individual
origin stories pretty well. Personally, I was a pretty big fan of 2013’s Man of Steel, which came with a slow
build, well-written, well-acted characters, and a non-linear plot structure to change
up the formula. It’s just that the movie’s wheels fell off during a slam-bang
third act that not only wiped out any notions of subtlety and character nuance,
but also flew in the face of what Superman is about. Still, setting the scene,
establishing the characters, their motivations and feelings, and building the
world…Man of Steel did that. So it's a shame DC seems to be rushing to copy the Avengers formula in search of a huge box office windfall instead of
taking their time (remember, Avengers
was the end result of four years of
Marvel origin stories building the characters and the universe).
Wonder
Woman’s accessibility—its mix of charm, humor, action, and drama—is obviously
the product of a lot of people putting forth real effort, starting with
Director Patty Jenkins and screenwriter Allan Heinberg. The movie develops
slowly and lets sequences breathe, yet it’s almost never boring over its 2-hour, 21-minute run-time. Sure, a straight drama or a non-superhero film might’ve
dug deeper and developed the characters more, but, for a movie that you know is
going to end as Wonder-Woman-Saves-the-World, it does about as well as could
be expected.
For that, the lion’s share of credit
goes to Gal Gadot and Chris Pine. I promise I won’t fawn over Gadot, but I will
say she is irresistibly appealing in this role, not only with her luminous looks
but her believable portrayal of Diana’s idealism, internal conflict, and shock and
horror at the realities of war. But I’m really close to saying it’s Pine’s
performance that makes the movie. Somehow, despite his iconic presence in the Star Trek series,
plus his appearance in last year’s Oscar-nominated drama Hell or High Water, I feel like this is the performance of his
career so far. Diana’s fish-out-of-water routine in London wouldn’t play as
well without someone so committed playing the straight opposite, and Pine gets
big laughs from his reactions to Diana’s cluelessness (“I didn’t have a father.
My mother sculpted me from clay.”… “Well that’s neat…”). Pine, more than Gadot,
is our catalyst in the film, and he makes the most of an amusing
come-sleep-with-me bit, a foray undercover with a German accent, and a dramatic
monologue where he tries to convince Diana that people are just evil sometimes.
And as good as Diana’s No Man’s Land scene is, for me, there’s no question: the
most impressive and memorable moment in the movie is one roughly 15-25-second
close-up of Pine’s face during a key action scene (you’ll know it when you see
it). It’s a marvel of expression and nuance, and it’s haunting.
Yes, as is wont to happen in movies like
this, a lot of the sincere development goes out the window during a boss-battle-style
finale in the third act. It’s a rough moment for David Thewlis, a fine actor
who gave my single favorite acting performance in all the Harry Potter films (in 2004’s Prisoner
of Azkaban). The effects are on par with an early 2000s video game, and the
acting flies way over the top. Not only is it a good reminder that we’re
watching a superhero movie, so of course it had to end in a big battle, but it
squanders a few moments of genuine nuance immediately preceding it, when Diana
was forced to ponder man’s morality—the idea that people just might not be
all good, that there isn’t just one bad guy you can kill to make everyone good
again, even though that would be easier. Overall, it’s safe to say, when Wonder Woman is being its straight,
sincere self, it cruises along. When it tries to amp up the effects to meet the
required standards of today’s superhero-obsessed movie industry (see also the unnecessary Zack Snyder slow-mo during a fight between WW and some Germans inside a building), it doesn’t work nearly as well.
Also, do we want to talk about how
Diana has supposedly been around all this time and got all fired up about WWI,
but apparently didn’t lift a hand to stop Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Vietnam, or
9/11? No? Okay.
In Summary
With Justice League coming out next week, one wonders: “how long will
the goodwill last?” Coming off two high profile disappointments from DC, Wonder Woman surprised many people with its assured
direction and conviction, strong acting and character development, poignant
love story and some really legit action sequences. It did fall into the
go-big-or-go-home third act effects extravaganza that hinders so many action
movies these days, but, having now seen it twice, I can say when I think of
this movie, I’ll think first of Gadot and Pine, their fine characterizations
and their chemistry, before I think off the iffy “boss battle” that closes things
out. I’m trying not to get my hopes up for Justice League, but in an era jam-packed
with superhero films, Wonder Woman
stands out.
WONDER WOMAN (2017)
Directed by Patty Jenkins
Screenplay by Allan Heinberg
Story by Zack Snyder, Allan Heinberg and Jason Fuchs
The character Wonder Woman created by William Moulton Marston
Rated PG-13
Story by Zack Snyder, Allan Heinberg and Jason Fuchs
The character Wonder Woman created by William Moulton Marston
Rated PG-13
Length: 141 minutes
No comments:
Post a Comment